Rule of Law?

Dear Elizabeth "Fauxcohontas" Warren,

I hear you are drafting a bill that would call for the enforcing of the law against emoluments described in the Constitution.  At which time then you may, months later, be able to ask that such be enforced.  Which would then let you offer encouragement to your fellow lawmakers to impeach the President who has now been violating the Constitution since he took the oath.

I'm about to go and rob a bank.  When I'm done, please tell the police to hold off on arresting me, and the DA to hold off on calling a Grand Jury until you can introduce a bill into Congress calling for the enforcement of that law against bank robbery.

After that law goes through all the various committees, and eventually gets passed, then use that as a tool to then offer encouragement to local courts and police to consider the possibility of bringing some action upon me.

Of course, the President would probably sign that law, so there'd be a great chance that I'd be brought to justice eventually, if only very slowly.

And of course, there is no chance that the Republican Congress will let your bill out of committee any time soon, or at all, or that the very President the bill is against will sign it into law, so there is absolutely no chance of him getting justice, fast or slow.

"Ow! Trump kicks hard!"

So as it will stand, my crime will be acted upon at once, without the police or courts waiting upon your futile efforts, and the President will NEVER have his crime acted upon because instead of calling for impeachment now - as you are supposed to - you'll just grandstand so that your liberal constituency can feel that you're doing something.

And you and your buddies on the Left and the Right wonder why the masses have no more respect for "the process".

Dean "Amicable Anarchist" West